Marrying an Adversary Doesn’t Mean Disqualification, Third Circuit Says
Following the Model Rules and erecting ethical screens allows adversary lawyers to date and marry.
Court:
Collateral Estoppel Can Bar Use of Federal Rule 45 to Quash a Subpoena, Circuit Says
Third Circuit says: You can object to a Rule 2004 discovery motion or move to quash a subpoena under Federal Rule 45, but not both.
Court:
Bankruptcy Courts Always Have Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction for ‘Core’ Matters
The Third Circuit opinion by Thomas Ambro explained that the ‘close nexus’ test does not apply when a post-conformation dispute is ‘core’ or entails enforcing a court order.
Court:
A ‘Notwithstanding’ Clause May Not Control a Specific Provision, District Judge Says
An appeal to the Third Circuit may tell us whether a ‘notwithstanding any other provision’ clause really means what it says.
Court:
Third Circuit Sets the Standard for Qualification of a Future Claimants’ Representative
A representative of future claimants must meet a higher standard than disinterestedness, the Third Circuit said, but technical conflicts may not be disqualifying.
Court:
Delaware Judge Approves ‘Uptier’ Financing that Involuntarily Subordinated Debt
Bankruptcy Judge Craig T. Goldblatt declined to interpret an indenture’s ratable treatment clause as anti-subordination in disguise.
Court:
Delaware Supreme Court: No ‘Insolvency Exception’ for Asset Sales
Delaware corporations must have shareholder approval to sell all or substantially all assets outside of bankruptcy.
Court:
Judge Walrath Describes Due Diligence to Plead After the Amendment to Section 547(b)
The amendment to Section 547(b) does not require a preference complaint to explain why the defendant doesn’t have affirmative defenses, Judge Walrath says.
Court:
Judge Ambro Explains the Primacy of Section 327(a) over State Ethics Rules
Absent an ‘actual conflict,’ disqualification is not automatic, the Third Circuit says.
Court:
Two Circuits Now Give Priority Status to Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Penalty
The Affordable Care Act’s ‘individual mandate’ was a tax measured by income, thus giving the IRS a priority tax claim.
Court: