Circuit City and Commissary
Unsecured Trade Creditors Committee
Committees
Relations between one company and another do not always follow a consistent and steady course. As the economy, industry dynamics, material prices and politics change, the relationship between the customer and suppliers will also often change. This article discusses recent and long-standing opinions of various U.S.
There currently exists a split as to whether goods delivered within 20 days of a filing that qualify as §503(b)(9) administrative expenses (“20-day claims” or “20-day goods”) may also serve as new value to defend a preference under § 547(c)(4). On Jan. 6, 2010, Hon.
Since Hon. Frank Easterbrook’s decision in the Kmart bankruptcy, [1] scholars and attorneys have commented on the decision and voiced their opposition to critical vendor orders in bankruptcy proceedings, yet such orders are still prevalent in bankruptcy cases.
Because there can be at least a two-year lag between a bankruptcy filing and a preference demand made pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §547, a consistent, proactive approach to gathering defense data is critical.
In bankruptcy cases, general unsecured claims can be found near the back of the line and are often paid pennies on the dollar.
Although a claim involving only goods sold to the debtor qualifies as an administrative expense under § 503(b)(9)[1] of the Bankruptcy Code, courts are split as to whether, and to what extent, this section covers so-called “hybrid” claims—those involving both goods and services transactions.
If your company is a member of the official committee of unsecured creditors (committee) and the bankruptcy your company is involved with is nearing the time of the confirmation of a liquidation plan, this article may be of interest to you. By now, you have gotten some idea of where the bankruptcy is heading.
In the wake of the global credit crisis, the U.S. housing market plummeted with values declining as much as 50 percent and home foreclosures at record highs. With lower asset values and frozen credit markets, it became difficult, if not impossible, for U.S. homebuilders to continue business operations. Many U.S.
The most accessible defense to a preference claim is the “new value” defense codified at 11 U.S.C. §547(c)(4). If the requirements of §547(c)(4) are met, this defense enables a creditor to avoid preference liability where it has already received a preferential transfer by subsequently providing new value to the debtor.
Co-Chair
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
New York, NY
(646) 414-6886
Co-Chair
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
New York, NY
(212) 225-3341
Communications Manager
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
Wilmington, DE
(302) 984-6058
Education Director
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
New York, NY
(212) 872-7453
Membership Relations Director
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Cincinnati, OH
(513) 651-6842
Newsletter Editor
Jackson Kelly PLLC
Lexington, KY
(859) 806-6756
Special Projects Leader
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Roseland, NJ
(973) 597-2500