Sites Committee

Committees

Post date: Friday, May 06, 2016

This article by C. Edward Dobbs provides a detailed outline for party advocates and mediators.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

On Dec. 1, 2015, the new bankruptcy forms went into effect. For creditors’ attorneys, the most notable of these forms is the proof-of-claim form. For debtors’ attorneys, the documents filed to commence the bankruptcy case are the ones that have most drastically changed.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

In recent times, proofs of claim, especially those filed by consumer lenders and debt purchasers, have come under increased scrutiny. Rule 3001 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP) has been amended twice since 2010 to define more specifically what information is required to be included with claims.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016
Photo of Richard John Cole, III
Richard John Cole, III

In a no-asset chapter 7 case, an unlisted debt is generally discharged.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

It is not uncommon for debtors in a chapter 7 case to express their intent to surrender collateral in their statement of intention. In chapter 13 cases, debtors may propose in their plan that they will surrender collateral. In either case, there are instances when a debtor actively defends a state foreclosure action after either receiving a discharge or surrendering the property.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

Recently, in Zachary v. Cal. Bank & Trust,[1] the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed with the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Tenth Circuits in holding that the absolute priority rule continues to apply to individual chapter 11 reorganizations, notwithstanding the 2005 BAPCPA amendments to the Bankruptcy Code.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016
Photo of Kenneth David Kraft
Kenneth David Kraft

The Ontario Court of Appeal[1] recently affirmed the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Nortel Networks Corporation (Re)[2] that the common law “Interest Stops Rule” applies in proceedings under Canada’s Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

In its January 2016 decision in Boomerang Tube Inc.,[1] Judge Mary F. Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court considered the U.S.

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

In June 2015, Bankruptcy Judge John T. Gregg ruled in In re Family Christian[1] that all administrative priority claims, including those arising under § 503(b)(9), must be paid as part of the price of a § 363 sale of the debtor’s assets.

Factual Background

Post date: Thursday, April 28, 2016

One of the most significant benefits of acquiring assets out of a bankruptcy estate is the ability to obtain those assets free and clear of liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, pursuant to § 363 of the Bankruptcy Code and the terms of a bankruptcy court sale order.

Pages

Please note that in order to view the content for the Committee Newsletters you must either sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member