Sites Committee

Committees

Post date: Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Health Care Committee Members Paul Rundell and Bobby Guy advise of 10 jointly administered cases before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Middle District) in which the debtors prevailed over arguments by the U.S. Trustee for Region 8 (UST) to the effect that BAPCPA effectively eliminated national health care cases.

Post date: Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Photo of William J. McLeod
William J. McLeod

Completing Form 22A necessarily requires the consideration of pre-petition debts, but if a debtor intends to surrender real estate, should that expense still be in

Post date: Monday, September 01, 2008
Photo of Dr. Annerose Tashiro
Dr. Annerose Tashiro

As expected, the Risk Limitation Bill (Risikobegrenzungsgesetz) passed the German Parliament (Bundestag) in July, which intends to ban stakeholders acting in unison to influence the management of a listed company concerning its future or its overall business purpose.  Originally, it came under fire from financial investors for being overzealous in its quest for tr

Post date: Monday, September 01, 2008

Two commonly misunderstood remedies in the young bankruptcy practitioner's tool box are the defenses of setoff and recoupment. Section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code preserves the nonbankruptcy right of a "creditor to offset a mutual debt owing by such creditor to the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case...." 11 U.S.C. §553(a).

Post date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Part I

Post date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008

A familiar complaint from someone who has sold real estate is that he  was not able to get the price that he asked for.  Equally familiar is the rejoinder of the broker; “I’m sorry, this is the best price we could get in this market.”  Ironically, the person that provides this rationalization is the same person who advised the seller how to price the property.

Post date: Friday, August 08, 2008

One of the most hotly debated aspects of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 was whether the unlimited homestead exemption in state

Post date: Friday, August 01, 2008

A circuit split. State vs. estate. Textualism vs. pragmatism. Despite its promise, this year's Supreme Court Bankruptcy Code interpretation bout- Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias Inc., 128 S.Ct. 2326 (2008)- was relatively dull. Pragmatism entered the ring disoriented and nervous, and was quickly k.o.'ed by textualism and the certainty of taxes.

Pages

Please note that in order to view the content for the Committee Newsletters you must either sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member