“Subprime Mortgage Crisis!” “Predatory Loans!” These are headlines that have dominated financial news for months.
Sites Committee
Committees
the court emphasized that the debtor's attorney's conduct in the case was above reproach (honest and straightforward), and held that it should not be inferred "as
In three recent New Jersey chapter 11 hospital sales, the unsettled legal issues associated with attempts to assign a hospital’s HHS provider agreement and/or its National Provider Identifier (NPI) without assigning the liabilities stemming from those agreements and NPIs were either avoided or postponed, rather than litigated.
This is the final article in a four-part series discussing collusion in bankruptcy sales. Part I discussed the prohibition of collusion in bankruptcy sales under §363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. Part II discussed the difference between permissible collaboration and impermissible collusion.
You are defending a client in a preference action, and the client tells you that its main contact at the pre-petition debtor was Bob Jones, the head of purchasing.
John Tittle, the co-chair of ABI’s Bankruptcy Taxation Committee, is a principal of NachmanHaysBrownstein Inc.
The treatment of discharged mortgage indebtedness under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) changed significantly with the enactment of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt R
![Photo of Jason Binford[1]](https://abi-org-corp.s3.amazonaws.com/committee/Authors/ABICommitteeLogo_221.png)
Part I of this four-part series discussed, in general terms, the prohibition of collusion in bankruptcy sales under section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Does this sound familiar? A client contacts you, very upset. A debtor, often a former spouse, significant other or business partner, has filed for bankruptcy.
Just when we think we’ve seen it all, something new shows up. This story was reported recently in the Houston Chronicle.
