Sites Committee

Committees

Post date: Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Post date: Wednesday, February 02, 2011
In In re Douglas Ray, [1] the Ninth Circuit recently held that a bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction to reopen a closed case to preclude a collateral attack on its prior, final sale order.
 
Background
Post date: Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Courts have wrestled with the definition of “individual” in the context of proceedings or defenses resulting from a violation of the automatic stay that arises whe

Post date: Wednesday, February 02, 2011

In bankruptcy, a debtor often faces assessments for interest and penalties on property taxes from a variety of taxing jurisdictions. Addressing these claims can be frustrating and time-consuming.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011

With the economy still lagging and an apparent end to federal assistance for state and local governments, some experts are predicting an increase in chapter 9 bankruptcy filings. Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a rarely used avenue for municipalities and other political subdivisions to obtain relief from creditors.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Photo of Gregory M. Zarin
Gregory M. Zarin

Since Hon. Frank Easterbrook’s decision in the Kmart bankruptcy, [1] scholars and attorneys have commented on the decision and voiced their opposition to critical vendor orders in bankruptcy proceedings, yet such orders are still prevalent in bankruptcy cases.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011

In this age of pre-packaged, pre-negotiated, and chapter 11 liquidation cases filed to effectuate a sale, it is becoming increasingly rare to work on chapter 11 cases that are filed without a clear exit strategy, much less one where the debtor is able to successfully reorganize.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Because there can be at least a two-year lag between a bankruptcy filing and a preference demand made pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §547, a consistent, proactive approach to gathering defense data is critical.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011

In a rare opinion addressing ethical and disclosure issues in the solicitation of official committees of unsecured creditors, the court in In re Universal Building Products [1]denied the applications of two proposed counsel for the committee in the case.

Post date: Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Many cases have dealt with bankruptcy petitions filed in “bad faith.” Typically, a party in interest seeks to simply have the petition dismissed, and seeks no further relief. Infrequently, however, a party may make the difficult decision to seek the imposition of sanctions against a bad faith filer and his or her counsel to deter future abuse of the Bankruptcy Code.

Pages

Please note that in order to view the content for the Committee Newsletters you must either sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member