Bankruptcy Litigation Committee
Committees
In June 2015, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decided In re Alternate Fuels Inc.,[1] clarifying its position on debt-equity recharacterization in light of two Supreme Court decisions and further entrenching a circuit split on recharacterization analysis.
Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code expressly subordinates claims arising from the purchase or sale of a security in the debtor or an affiliate to the level of equity. It thus functions as a form of recharacterization. Despite its broad scope, § 510(b) is relatively underused, making it a potentially powerful tool for creative debtors, committees and trustees.
Courts have held that bankruptcy courts have the authority to recharacterize debt to equity if the circumstances warrant such treatment. However, circuit courts are divided as to which provision of the Bankruptcy Code provides such authority. The majority looks to the court’s equitable powers.
Private-equity funds typically provide capital to portfolio companies through equity infusions and debt financing depending on the fund’s investment strategy and the needs of the portfolio company.
The Bankruptcy Litigation Committee had a tremendous 2015! We strived to continue to provide our members with enlightening and useful substantive information, while also offering enjoyable and valuable social and networking opportunities.
The collapse of a business is traumatic for any owner-operator. They worry about their employees, damage to their reputations, and may well face an uncertain financial future. If the business was operated as a corporation, the failure of the company may have a devastating impact on the owner-operator, but she will not likely be compelled to repay compensation she received as an officer of the company prior to the filing.
Trump Entertainment Resorts Trump AC Casino Marks, LLC (the “licensee/debtor”) filed voluntary petitions for chapter 11 relief on Sept. 9, 2014. On Aug. 5, 2014, Trump Marks, LLC sought to terminate the royalty-free trademark license previously granted to the licensee/debtor.
In today’s corporate bankruptcy world, a debtor’s most important and valuable assets often come in the form of intellectual property (IP). Understanding the effect of bankruptcy on IP licenses is crucial not only for debtors, but also for existing licensees and for potential purchasers of IP assets.
This article addresses how the decision in In re Crumbs Bake Shop Inc.[1] continues the evolution of trademark licensing in bankruptcy and contributes to an understanding of the fate of Intellectual Property (IP) during a § 363 asset sale.
Co-Chair
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Louisville, KY
(502) 779-8178
Co-Chair
Sottile & Barile, LLC
Loveland, OH
(859) 912-1659
Communications Manager
Stinson LLP
Arlington, VA
(202) 728-3035
Education Director
Burr & Forman LLP
Tampa, FL
(813) 367-5760
Membership Relations Director
Landis Rath & Cobb LLP
Wilmington, DE
(302) 467-4400
Newsletter Editor
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Dallas, TX
(214) 580-5852
Special Projects Leader
ASK LLP
New York, NY
(212) 528-0156
Special Projects Leader
WilmerHale
Washington, DC
(202) 663-6551
Special Projects Leader
Robinson & Cole LLP
New York, NY
(786) 520-8074