Rochelle's Daily Wire

A deferred settlement agreement, like a workout agreement, can’t be assumed under Section 365.

District judge remonstrates a solvent parent company for seeking the protections of bankruptcy without filing chapter 11 itself.

A court filing by a claims trader was stricken from the docket because it contained judges’ direct email addresses.

An opinion by Thomas Ambro shows how the Third Circuit won’t cut any slack for nonbankruptcy lawyers when it comes to retention disclosure.

The failure to convert a contingent interest into ownership is not a transfer that could be avoided as a fraudulent transfer.

Although deposed as debtor in possession, the Subchapter V debtor retains the sole power to file a chapter 11 plan.

There’s no circuit split on post-petition interest, because the Second Circuit agreed with the Third, Fifth and Ninth Circuits.

California bankruptcy judge doubts the Ninth Circuit will adopt the BAP’s dicta by holding that technical stay violations are only voidable, not void.

Judge David Thuma explains why a chapter 11 debtor in possession and a subsequent liquidating trust are different clients for the purpose of a conflict analysis, at least when the committee has confirmed a liquidating plan.

Sticking to her guns, Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath rules that the solvent-debtor exception was abrogated by the adoption of the Bankruptcy Code, but certifies a direct appeal to the Court of Appeals.